Write 8 pages thesis on the topic critique of a piece of research. In relation to ethnographic research, the term access means having the permission to get to and being able to use the information to help the researcher carry out the study (Barbour, 2010, p.160). Since ethnography entails with cultural values of the people, the permission to have access and use such information could be denied, meaning that the researcher might not accomplish the task perfectly (Barbour, 2010, p.172). The author argues that getting the right and rich information about people’s cultures is only possible behind secure doors. Here, the access to such information should assure its safety, thereby barring people from misusing the preservation of cultural values and attributes.

There are several ways of obtaining access to ethnographic work. For example, the author obtained access through permission and negotiation (Barbour, 2010, p.160). From the evidence provided in the research, the permission is sought from the gatekeepers, including the college of study, whereas negotiation with the individual lecturers, then the students (Barbour, 2010, p.160). Notably, after getting permission from the respective college, the lectures are the ones to allow the researcher access to the classrooms. thereafter the students give the required information (Mcnamee, 2001, p.425).

Also, the author indicates that, with the use of new technologies, the researcher might be privileged to escape the classroom and carry out the study in a conceptual and personal space, concerning the socio-cultural context under the investigation (Barbour, 2010, p.162). In his claim, the technological accessibility of information is perceptual.

In essence, issues such as the nature of the information required, either they are discrete or easily accessible perpetually using, technological applications (Meng, 2009, p.160). In addition, the permission of consent should also be considered before obtaining access to ethnographic research.&nbsp. &nbsp.

The author used the term “insider” to refer to being someone who is familiar with the system (Barbour, 2010, p.160). The researcher indicated that his prior work at the college guaranteed the familiarity due to a number of reasons. First, he knew most of the lecturers, from whom. he would seek permission to conduct the study. Those lecturers would easily accept the request to enter the classrooms.