The work has not been graded but I like the output that was submitted to me. Is it possible for the same prof to do the next assignment I will be submitting? If possible, I will greatly appreciate it.
I need help creating a thesis and an outline on SPSS Analysis for Corporate Social Performance. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. We now check for a significant difference in the mean social disclosure between the two groups (B2C and B2B). From the table below, the p-value for Lavene’s test is 0.026 (a value less than a 5% significance level, this means that the variability in the two conditions is different we, therefore, assume unequal variances and use the p-value assuming equal variances. The p-value is 0.332 (a value greater than 5% significance level), we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no statistically significant difference between the two conditions (B2C and B2B). We can conclude that the differences between condition Mean (for the community spend) are likely due to chance and not likely due to the independent variable manipulation.
From the table below, the p-value for Lavene’s test is 0.578 (a value greater than 5% significance level, which means that the variability in the two conditions is about the same we, therefore, assume equal variances and use the p-value assuming equal variances. The p-value is 0.076 (a value greater than 5% significance level), we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no statistically significant difference between the two conditions (B2C and B2B). We can conclude that the differences between condition Means (for the environment disclosure score) are likely due to chance and not likely due to the independent variable manipulation.
We now check for a significant difference in the mean social disclosure between the two groups (High and Low). From the table below, the p-value for Lavene’s test is 0.202 (a value greater than a 5% significance level, this means that the variability in the two conditions is about the same we, therefore, assume equal variances and use the p-value assuming equal variances. The p-value is 0.517 (a value greater than 5% significance level), we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no evidence of a statistically significant difference between the two conditions (High and Low). We can conclude that the differences between condition Mean (for the community spend) are likely due to chance and not likely due to the independent variable manipulation.
Show more
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more