Culture drives quality—if an organization does not have a culture in which they hold themselves and others accountable, it is probable that it will not achieve and sustain high-level quality outcomes. Patient safety is defined as freedom from accidental injury; you have seen how medical errors are harmful, and that there are second victims that suffer as well. Remember quality can be defined as “the cumulative impact of all that happens to a patient while in an organization’s care” (Porter, 2012, p. 193).
A Just Culture gives organizations a template to uniformly address the shortcomings or errors of those who fail. It addresses failures in four different areas, which include 1) human errors and mistakes, meaning unintentional harm; 2) carelessness or at-risk behavior—or not paying attention that results in an error; 3) recklessness or a flagrant disregard for norms where an error occurs unintentionally, but because of recklessness; and 4) those who just do not pay attention and have no regard for authority.
In this Discussion, you will identify a model that a health care organization might use to improve their culture of quality and describe whether the ethical theory of Just Culture would improve the quality and why.
To prepare:
Review Learning Resources on culture and patient safety.
Post a cohesive response to the following:
Post a model you have selected that health care organizations might use to improve the culture of quality. Describe whether the ethical theory of Just Culture would improve the quality of a health care organization and how.
Support your response by identifying and explaining key points and/or examples presented in the Learning Resources.
Resources:
Joshi, M. S., Ransom, E. R., Nash, D. B., & Ransom, S. B. (Eds.). (2014). The healthcare quality book: Vision, strategy, and tools (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.
Chapter 8, “The Culture Connection: Hardwiring Consistent Quality Delivery” (pp. 193–206)
Chapter 11, “Patient Safety and Medical Errors” (pp. 269–294)
Chapter 12, “Creating a Culture of Safety and High Reliability” (pp. 297–324)
Detsky, A. S., Baerlocher, M. O., & Wu, A. W. (2013). Admitting mistakes: Ethics says yes, instinct says no. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 185(5), 448.
Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
MacLeod, L. (2014). “Second Victim” casualties and how physician leaders can help. Physician Executive, 40(1), 8–12.
Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Nelson, W. A. (2013). Addressing the second victims of medical error. Healthcare Executive, 28(2), 56–59.
Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Stempniak, M. (2014). The other victim. When a patient is harmed, staff often suffer in silence. Hospitals & Health Networks, 88(7), 18.
Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more