Complete 7 pages APA formatted article: Psychology as Biologys Branch. Evaluating these two could sometimes confuse people for both explain human body, biology for the body processes and social for cognitive and behavioral matters. Considering psychology as part of social science, is there really a difference between biology and psychology? Furthermore, is it better if psychology would be considered as branch of biology? Making psychology as one of biology’s branches would be better enough for both focus on the same matter – life. To understand why it is better to make psychology one of the branches of biology, it is good to define the terms first. It is a good foundation for a clear understanding of the concepts. Several people define the word “biology” as something that talks about physicality. It could be the body of the animals and plants. It can also be bacteria, a protist and so on. It also includes those processes that make a system work. To define it with credibility, Biology is: To explain further the definition of biology based on the above mentioned, it is good to evaluate it words by words. Biology, as explained as “the science of life or living matter in all its forms and phenomena…” (“Biology”) talks only about what life is. Anything that has life and every term and concept on how life works can be studied through biology. However, there are several life structures that might somehow, confuse people. Plants do have life and also animals. Unfortunately, they have parts that are different from each other but distinguish them among others. Botany is the study of plants and zoology is for the animals. Both studies have their own “specialty” or “specification” of study but both talk about what is life and its attribution. Thus, botany and zoology are subdivisions of biology. Another part of its definition is “… especially with reference to origin, growth, reproduction, structure, and behavior” (“Biology”).